#DEEP BLUE CHESS FINAL MESSAGE FULL#

Deep Blue 'did everything to lose the game but not enough,' Kasparov said after the match. Kasparov's position became better and better.

#DEEP BLUE CHESS FINAL MESSAGE FULL#

Kasparov does not hide his feelings during the game, and we were treated to the full range of facial expressions: a smile when Deep Blue weakened its position and then a huge grimace when the consequences of one of Deep Blue's neat ideas dawned. But to compensate for that, the machine did what all machines like to do during a game of chess: It grabbed a pawn and refused to give it back. It seemed to work as Deep Blue got its pieces in a muddle.

The idea was to avoid tactics at which Deep Blue excels and make strategic factors paramount. The world champion produced a real surprise as early as move one and we were treated to an opening move obviously prepared for the computer, something that Kasparov would never play against a human. It must be so hard to face an opponent that you cannot see who plays so unevenly and, of course, in certain positions, perfectly. Deep Blue played rather as it did in Game 1 and mixed some bad positional moves that betrayed a lack of appreciation of strategy with some superb tactical ideas. Garry Kasparov was visibly frustrated by his lack of success, an emotion that surfaced at the press conference in what diplomats might call a 'frank exchange of views' with Deep Blue chess consultant Joel Benjamin.Р вЂќР вЂћfter Deep Blue's sublime performance in Game 2 it was back to normal computer-vs.-human chess. The first draw of the match leaves it tied at the halfway stage. The champion finds it difficult to pinpoint the real Deep Blue. Deep Blue has to find an improvement over its play in game 1 but whatever the outcome, its clearly worthy of its nickname Deeper Blue. Kasparov has the advantage of the white pieces in Tuesday's third game, and will welcome the rest day to collect his thoughts.

The Deep Blue team received a standing ovation and their chess expert Joel Benjamin summed it up: ' This was real chess.' Kasparov was stunned by his defeat and left the playing area at great speed without comment. Maybe its time to rewrite the textbooks, the match is alive again at 1-1.

The computer stunned the audience and particularly the watching Grandmasters by playing a seamless strategic game in a type of blocked position that conventional wisdom has always held, favors the human player. So this proves it, last year's win for Deep Blue was no fluke. With the tension rising, Deep Blue was provoked into an unsound attack that weakened its position still further - but such was the ferocity of its assault that it took all of Kasparov's tactical skill to rebuff the computer.Р вЂќР вЂћlthough nominally ahead on material, Deep Blue was strategically lost after the queens were exchanged and the world champion methodically wrapped up the endgame.Р вЂќР’Вeep Blue has white tomorrow, and Kasparov will find it much harder to control the play. Kasparov kept his nerve, and the advantage, but consumed valuable thinking time and could be seen chiding himself at one point when he appeared to have missed the best move.

Deep Blue seemed a little bemused at first and played a few innacurate and weakening moves but it came right back into the game with a retreat that no one had foreseen. Garry Kasparov showed us what 'Anti Computer Chess' was today and played cat and mouse with Deep Blue, accumulating small advantages without risking anything. For the first time a computer program beaten a world champion chess player. In May 1997, IBM's Deep Blue Supercomputer played a fascinating match with the reigning World Chess Champion, Garry Kasparov.

Deep blue chess final message